I don’t remember what made me think of it but I took a fancy to build an Orrery a little while ago. Naturally, my first recourse was to scour the web via Google for plans. I would have liked to find some dimensioned drawings in the style of engineering. What I did find was lots of other people looking for plans, designs, cad drawings etc. Noone seemed to have drawn together the following links, although a few were referenced here and there.
So, for any one else on the same quest, here is what I found…
James Ferguson: Mechanical Paradox and Sun-Earth-Moon Orrery
The so-called mechanical paradox is the basis for an orrery that differs from general practice in the way the moon is treated.
Scanned/OCR of the original account including both paradox and Orrery.
Construction notes for the paradox but not the orrery from Amateur Work Magazine Vol4.
Notes on the paradox and construction of a the orrery by Ian Coote and James Donnelly (which also appeared in the Horological Journal):
- Building the paradox model
- Building the Orrery, part1 and part2 with some more pictures
This wasn’t what I was looking for but these articles contain some ideas on approaches to construction that could be useful in designing an Orrery as well as some possible gear trains.
From the Scientific Instrument Society, two articles by Michael Whiting:
- Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society No. 94 (2007) has more general information
- Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society No. 101 (2009) focuses on a Jovilabe
Less important (IMO) is an article from Meccano Magazine.
Again, not what I was looking for… and Lego is not what I intend to use but possibly useful.
Best is the NASA Kepler mission has quite a few pages of information, with several models. These inspired Robert Munafo to make some modifications and to document his work.
I also found a couple of other sites that might be of interest if you do plan to use Lego:
Other Useful Sites
An anonymous blogger briefly describes making an Orrery with a minimum of tools and purchased gears. This is a bit inaccurate for my taste but the design is nice and unfussy.
The SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System (ADS) has scanned articles from 1938 detailing gear trains (using standard gears), an initial one by Roy Marshall and a subsequent one proposing improvements by Charles Balleisen.
There is also usually a book, “Making a Tellurian/Orrery” (ISBN 1905013027) for sale on ebay.
Calculating Gear Trains
If you plan to design from scratch then the question of what gear ratios to use comes into play. If you don’t mind an inaccurate Orrery then a simple pair of gears is easy to work out but compound gears don’t have quick calculator-based solutions.
The old way of doing this, based on some 19th century maths (it still works though and is elegant to those with a mathematical bent) and going under the name of the “Stern-Brocot Tree” is mainly of historical interest. The less elegant but more practical modern approach is a fairly simply computer algorithm with a bit of brute force computer power to do lots of calculations quite fast. One such algorithm appears in Robert Norton’s Book, “The Design of Machinery”, which is freely available on Scrib as an old edition or for purchase (which includes a CD/DVD).
I have almost finished writing a program in C# for Windows using the above-mentioned algorithm which I will make available via this blog in due course (including source code).
7 thoughts on “Building an Orrery #1: Looking for Plans”
I have only just found your website after looking for orrery plans myself for a very long time and sadly coming up with nothing. I have found the sites you have referenced , and notes you have acquired very useful. I just thought I would thank you for this and ask how your orrery is coming along?
Ben – thanks for your comments, appreciated. The Orrery is still a dream as I don’t get into the workshop too often, other projects etc. I think I’ll have a crack at a version of the “Fergusons Orrery” first but in the mean time I’ve set myself the project of adapting a rotary table with a stepper motor as I think I’d lose my sanity and make too many errors with conventional indexing plates.
I’m the guy who put together brassorrery.blogspot.com a couple of years ago. If you’re still looking to do this, I’ve just updated the site and added scale accurate 3d plans done in google sketchup. I’m planning to redo the orrery with a little more sophistication and needed to have more accuracy, so I put together the 3d model. A few people seem to be following these plans, there’s at least one person out there who is very nearly finished (and has done a much more sophisticated job than I did).
Hi Murray – thanks for the tip. I’m still side-tracked on other things, but I’ll get there eventually and be gleaning intelligence from your site.
I too am trying to gather info to build an orrery. I’m a woodworker so I’ll be using bandsaw cut wooden gears. Alas, as a music teacher (we only generally have to count to four; well sometimes 5, or 7 for Stravinsky and the like) the mathematical calculations are beyond me. I want to build just a Sun, Earth, Moon model showing the correct rotation of the earth and the moon around the earth. What possible compound gear ratios could I use (trying to avoid tooth counts over 60 or so, and less than 9). I did try to download your calculator, but this failed. Any help would be appreciated.
(with some hesitation since I am still to start actually making one)
I would have a look at the Ferguson Orrery.
It seems someone agrees – http://lisaboyer.com/Claytonsite/mechanicalparadoxpage.htm
The Ferguson sun/earth/moon is irritating to an engineer since the tooth shapes cannot all be “proper” but with a bandsaw you should be in a better position than with standard cutters.
Yes, I have seen that link and it is interesting. I’m leaning more to something like his Copernican planetary orrery plan. However, the moon does not rotate around the earth in that particular build. You have perhaps seen this http://www.grand-illusions.com/acatalog/Orrery_Kit.html. This is pretty close to what I’m wanting to do, but with gears and/or a chain drive. You are correct in that wooden gears allow leeway and “tweaking” with sandpaper and files to get everything running smoothly. I ran the whole thing by my brother (a retired aerospace engineer) on the phone this evening and he said “you usually just look it up in tables”. But that takes me back to my earlier post (read “dumb” musician) and difficulty understanding the mathematics.